SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (12550)3/13/2001 11:49:02 AM
From: Sabrejet  Respond to of 30051
 
I boxed JNPR a while ago. What a mistake that was! Still took a boat load of points though. On a washout, I'll cover the short and pray that everyone needs a router for the holidays!

Sabre!



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (12550)3/13/2001 11:49:49 AM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev:
NAZ Trin 0.41 and tick -852
odd combination at first glance; not smart enough to make sense of it.

your thoughts

john



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (12550)3/13/2001 11:50:21 AM
From: jjeannie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Another dumb question: what is holy one and what is bu$$? Sorry keep bothering you.



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (12550)3/13/2001 12:15:45 PM
From: Rashomon  Respond to of 30051
 
Zeev, my own take on current VLNC trading action: Berg likely feels he did his share with the recent $30M injection, which brings his ownership to about 20 percent. Between that and the IBD monies, VLNC is funded for about another year. Meanwhile, production and licensing is proceeding, and if there is positive news on those fronts, the share price will be supported naturally. Meanwhile, while Berg is sitting on a mountain of cash and cash flow, he likely will be looking for other opportunities in this market. He's always been the VC of last resort, and I suspect some pretty interesting propositions are being carried to him these days.