Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (134517)	3/13/2001 7:10:01 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1589246

Now you all are saying that but back in Nov-Dec, there was a different version running around...that the election confusion was causing problems for the Naz and once a new president was elected there would be a rally.....that in fact the markets would prefer Bush over Gore. I wasn't saying that. I am only responsible for what I post. I do think the markets did at the time prefer Bush over Gore and either to uncertainty. However I think that whole issue was only a very small part of the bear market. If Bush or Gore or anyone else had won a landslide, or a clear but norrow victory, there still would have been a bear market that at most would be marginally different then what we are facing now. The bear market was not caused by Gore or by election uncertainty. Tim