SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/14/2001 12:02:31 AM
From: westpacific  Respond to of 74559
 
Fred - Thank you for that contribution. A beauty for the thread and sooooooooooo true. Something many good traders have known for sometime.

And this is just the start. People need to look at BV and also at Cash Value, this is how to determine which stocks and at what price you want to buy them. Case in point JDSU - Book Value is $2.34 and Cash Value is $3.66 and today it trades at $58 5/8. You tell me what you would like to pay for it. Myself I would say $10 to $15 is what it is worth.

So people need to start looking at fundies, this is my game now. And let me tell you, there is value in tech land. Not all are bloated - just take the time to find them, they are out there.

And even on the bounces trade these, much safer and these will move quicker to upside as they are the ones folks want to own. Not giving up my pics - but I have 5 gems I bought last 2 days on the 52 wk lows.

All the best.

West



To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/14/2001 11:44:19 AM
From: tradermike_1999  Respond to of 74559
 
this is a classic



To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/14/2001 12:30:44 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Good post Fred. Thanks Kastel EOM



To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/15/2001 1:27:29 AM
From: Roger Sherman  Respond to of 74559
 
Message 15506371



To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/15/2001 4:11:53 AM
From: LTK007  Respond to of 74559
 
awesome post--if it hasn't already been placed in "Cool Posts" it should be.My complements to Larry Edelson and to you for digging it out and presenting it here.max



To: fred woodall who wrote (2378)3/16/2001 12:16:04 PM
From: bambs  Respond to of 74559
 
great reading...thanks.

bambs