Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131724)	3/13/2001 11:24:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Then I guess you think Jesse Jackson's case is unique. What he'll be paying ( or more accurately his contributors will be paying ) could hardly be called a pittance. The pittance (in most cases) that men pay, if they get caught and are forced to, is no substitute and could never replace a responsible father.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131724)	3/13/2001 11:40:57 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 769670

Nevertheless, you fail to denounce claims for paternity by your answer, and thereby are willing to force men to do certain things without giving them a say. Correct? ~SB~ PS. I find it interesting that you bring up the issue of compensation for child-rearing, as if it's not a labor of love. Perhaps that explains a whole lot...

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (131724)	3/13/2001 11:46:02 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Dear J_F_Shepard, I don't know if you are among those who have decided that their gene pool will become extinct. I have three children now adults. No amount of money can compensate a woman or a man for a lifetime of JOY child rearing. tom watson tosiwmee