SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (8424)3/14/2001 11:17:28 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 82486
 
Karen, W may be pulling the rug out from under Whitman, but I don't think he's pulling the rug out from under Norton. Norton may be smoother than her mentor Watt, but regardless of what her publicist told the Post, I doubt if she has any real philosophical differences with Watt or W for that matter.

Here's the Times story:

Bush Reverses Vow to Curb Gas Tied to Global Warming nytimes.com

The pressure to make the decision came in part from lobbyists for coal companies
and utilities dependent on coal and from the conservative wing of the Republican
Party, which saw any move to regulate carbon dioxide as an implicit endorsement of
the goals of the Kyoto Protocol. . . .

A White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said Mr. Bush had made his decision
in consultation with his cabinet.

"The president is following through on his commitment to a multipollutant strategy
that will significantly reduce pollutants," Mr. McClellan said. "CO2 should not have
been included as a pollutant during the campaign. It was a mistake."


Whitman is cabinet level, but Norton is cabinet, and Whitman's boss to boot.



To: Lane3 who wrote (8424)3/14/2001 11:26:43 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Imagine, an EPA administrator being so clueless as Whitman - OK, so Browner was worse.

But Whitman's ignorance is frightening. Let's hope she learns on the job.