Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (33423)	3/14/2001 11:46:12 AM
From: Venkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

What relation are you to tokyo joe ??

To: Voltaire who wrote (33423)	3/14/2001 1:06:30 PM
From: Dalin	Respond to of 65232

" I have to admit that I have never made a correct call in the last four years of posting. Every call has been incorrect " Hah........WRONG AGAIN! I happen to know.....you were right....at least once. <g> Ahhh the good ol......DELL days. They can't get those profits back.....their floatin underneath me now. :0) Rollin on da river

To: Voltaire who wrote (33423)	3/14/2001 1:36:58 PM
From: Bob Pittsfield	Respond to of 65232

Tom, LMAO.......I made a lot of money on QCOM and also a bunch on covered calls. Do I have to give it all back? And if so to who........the houses? LOL Nah, guess I will keep it. Thanks Vman! Hope you hit them straight today. Bob

To: Voltaire who wrote (33423)	3/14/2001 1:49:59 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

Is the Nasdaq going to head for a triple bottom test of 1922...?? Message 15501957 Man, we have lots of folks analyzing this market --> it seems to be more popular than many big sports events. I still remain cautiously optimistic and hope the FED steps up to the plate and delivers a BIG rate cut...=) Best Regards, Scott

To: Voltaire who wrote (33423)	3/14/2001 3:10:09 PM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

First of all Tom, I didn't think I was mouthing off to you......I thought I was quite respectful as I always am to you. I asked a couple of questions. Questions that seem pertinent to me, and obviously others. You chose to not answer and instead give me some crap about just do the opposite of you and all will be OK...... Frankly, I am quite surprised at your response. Let me ask you a very simply question.....what was wrong with the two questions I asked you? Hell Tom, I am trying to figure out this market like everybody else...thats why we ask questions......I think my questions earlier were serious and were asked with no bad intent. You are supposed to be the King of Psychology when it comes to this market.....so why not ask the psychologist some psychological questions??? Anyway, I'm sorry you took my post as you did and sorry you prefer to not answer the questions and instead poke fun at the situation.......yea, like I'm really gonna go short this market, right......sorry, not me....... You make fun of this "lawsuit" thing, like I have something to do with it.....all I did was bring it to your attention......Now, I am sorry i did. It seems the more you try and help around here, the more mis-understood you are...if you ask a question that may have negative implications, you are not taken seriously and are immediately cast as somebody that is against you. No offense Tom, I had two relatively simple questions that i asked...I did not jump all over you....I had some questions dealing with the psychology of this market and I asked you about them. I am sorry you have taken the attitude that you have.....all I was/am seeking are answers/opinions/advice and etc...just like everybody else. No big deal here, however, if you prefer not to answer, just tell me to get lost or something, but please do not respond like I am from the clown thread over here to annoy you. Thanks Keith