SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (19448)3/14/2001 1:28:45 PM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24042
 
But Greenspan is a bigger menace........."The economy lost steam abruptly late last year, with growth sliding to a 1.1 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, the slowest pace in 5-1/2 years. Inventories at the same time climbed quickly as firms, which had been enjoying insatiable demand, were caught off guard by rapidly slowing demand.".........no thanks to Alan!!



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (19448)3/14/2001 5:37:39 PM
From: Howard C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
You are FUNNY, Tunica....good joke...that WAS a joke, right?....yesterday, he breaks his pledge to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, made unequivacally and emphatically as a campaign policy during the campaign...and where does he go to make his first speech explaining this?...to the Chamber of Commerce!!! Gee, I wonder how they got a hold of his nipples so fast?....



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (19448)3/15/2001 2:05:17 PM
From: Hank Stamper  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
I am greatly amused at the sheer number of messages on this and other boards that utter the complaint that 'Greenspan has damaged the economy and/or the stock markets.' All jokes are based in some form of irony and this, is no different. A year ago, caught in the thrall of seemingly ever-rising corporate profits and stock prices, the same number of posts said, 'Greenspan is irrelevant in the new era so we need not concern ourselves with rising rates and shrinking money supply.' My goodness! How could he possibly hurt the fiber optic build-out? <g>

One is left wondering how many who wrote last year's message are authors of today's.

Hank Stamper