SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mang Cheng who wrote (4197)3/15/2001 7:25:21 AM
From: KevRupert  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6784
 
Palm Valuation:

Mang,

I'm not suggesting that Palm should be valued on a P/E basis. I'm just trying to determine an appropriate valuation. Palm isn't cheap because it used to sell for $60. It has to be valued like any other company -- using whatever metric that may be. I'm curious to learn what metrics investors are using.

But it has to be some valuation metric, and not esoteric calculations. If a valuation metric is not used, then $160 can be interpreted as "cheap" as well as $16.



To: Mang Cheng who wrote (4197)3/15/2001 9:41:36 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Respond to of 6784
 
Is 2.4 too high as compare to 1.5?

An even more important question is if 1.5 itself is too high...