Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (120474)	3/15/2001 1:22:02 PM
From: hdl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

another guy like you who thinks retail is an arcane science. Network Search ¦ Sites ¦ Services ¦ ITcareers ¦ Product Finder Advertise Hot Jobs ITcareers Search Jobs: Find the best IT jobs. New opportunities posted every day. Job Alert: Get the latest IT jobs emailed to you. Post Jobs: Recruit fast. Hire smart. Post jobs in minutes for only $200. IS Survival Guide Careers Guides Finding a job Continuing education Business planning Friday, Mar. 9, 2001 1:01 pm PT IS Survival Guide \|Bob Lewis Business-to-business can benefit from the miscues of b-to-c vets MANAGEMENTSPEAK: We strive to be the industry leader. TRANSLATION: We strive to copy our competitors, but on the cheap. -- This week's anonymous contributor is now an industry phrase leader. B-TO-b-to-b-to-b-to-b-to-b-to-b-to-b-to-b. Sounds like Porky Pig, doesn't it? And just as Porky's stuttering means nothing until the actual words come along, it doesn't matter how many b-to-bs you have -- none of them create any value at all until a b-to-c happens. All business-to-business transactions are in the middle of a value chain; the end is always business-to-consumer -- customers consume the goods and provide the money that powers the rest of it. The term b-to-c created a huge potential for "ignorant expertise." The newness of the term gave some pundits the misguided impression that there's something new about b-to-c itself, which in turn meant their general-purpose New Economy theories gave them something useful to say about the subject. The only thing new about b-to-c, though, is the term. There's nothing at all new about b-to-c transactions. Until about two years ago it was called "retailing." Experts in the field still call it that. No matter how hard your business is, retailing is harder. Bank on it. If you think your manufacturing company has an elaborate bill of materials, visit a big-box retailer and think about its inventory management. For soft lines (clothing and the like), every SKU (Stock Keeping Unit) comes in multiple sizes and colors. A knit shirt may come in six sizes and eight colors. That one shirt represents 48 separate items to track. How many different shirts can you find in Target or Wal-Mart? In b-to-b you sell through creation of tangible value. In retail? It's fashion, status, convenience, the customer's mood, price, and of course, store design and merchandising. "E-tailing" was going to transform the whole business of selling to consumers through the magic of Internet b-to-c. Too bad so many e-tailing experts knew nothing about retailing. If they did, they'd have known there's no such thing as online retailing. When you sell online, as a retailer friend of mine pointed out more than a year ago, the shopper's psychology has nothing to do with entering a store and everything to do with buying from a catalog. Catalog shoppers care more about convenience, less about physical interaction with merchandise, and not at all about the immediate gratification of coming home with the goods -- the exact opposite of in-store shoppers, who see, touch, and often try on merchandise and can wear it or hang it on the walls as soon as they get home. That's why market estimates for online retailing are completely wrong and always have been. E-tailing is bounded by the number of catalog shoppers -- a far smaller segment than retailing. Although the boundary isn't fixed, it isn't all that elastic either. An e-tailer's business processes are those of a cataloger. Whereas a retailer's warehouse is designed for logistics -- as an intermediate distribution point, shipping crates and pallets to stores -- a cataloger's warehouse is designed for fulfillment: pick, pack, and ship. It's a very different discipline. Having a warehouse doesn't make you ready to offer customers online shopping carts. And then there's the little matter of returns, or "reverse logistics" for the fully buzzword-compliant. Awhile back I suggested that Amazon.com's success would depend on it opening physical stores. Returns are just one reason, but an important one. Mailing books back to Amazon.com for a refund is a pain in the neck for all involved. If you bought it at Barnesandnoble.com, you'd drive to their nearest store, where you'd probably leave with more books than you returned. You work for a b-to-b company. What does this have to do with you? B-to-b companies have plenty to learn from retail. A good place to start is Paco Underhill's book, Why We Buy. As you read it, I expect you'll find lots of notions you can use in your own business. Among those notions will be many examples of how limited a role IT has to play when a business meets its customers.That's a subject we'll explore next week. Until then, go shopping. The economy needs you. Get the IS Survival Guide via e-mail E-business-enable yourself for free by getting my column via e-mail each week. Sign up at www.iwsubscribe.com. Missed a column? Click here for more Have a similar experience? Send Bob an email at ISSurvivor@cs.com. Bob Lewis is a Minneapolis-based consultant with Perot Systems. More articles on E-Commerce Back to top Email the editor Sabre outsources IT to EDS in $2.2 billion deal Report: BellSouth looking to buy Sprint Nokia forecasts profit growth, warns on sales Intel delays Irish chip production to 2003 Sabre outsources IT to EDS in $2.2 billion deal Go to home page Subscribe to our free email newsletters Subscribe to InfoWorld print HOME \| NEWS \| TEST CENTER \| OPINIONS \| EVENTS \| FORUMS \| CAREERS \| STOCK QUOTE SUBJECT INDEXES \| SUBSCRIBE \| ABOUT US \| SEARCH Copyright © 2001 InfoWorld Media Group, Inc. InfoWorld.com is a member of IDG.net InfoWorld.com complies with the ASME guidelines with IDG extensions For New media.