Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (67774)	3/15/2001 3:16:47 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, "This is VERY serious if true" Another interesting observation: the ruling was signed on March 7, 2001. Surprisingly, the smooth and quiet drop in RMBS commons, siliconinvestor.com started exactly at the same time. I wonder if there is somebody in-the-know who seriously benefited from this ruling... What do you think?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (67774)	3/15/2001 3:22:23 PM
From: pheilman_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Jim, Posted on Rambus site. rambusite.com To paraphrase: In the United States District Court... Rambus v. Infineon ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that: ... (3) (a) the attorney-client privilege has been forfeited under the crime-fraud exception as to certain topics, and therefore the Defendants may conduct depositions of Messrs. Diepenbrock, Vincent, Crisp, Mitchell and Tate respecting the legal advice provided about disclosures of patents and patent applications to JEDEC by Rambus, Inc., the disclosure policy of JEDEC and about efforts by Rambus, Inc. to broaden its patents to cover matters pertaining to the JEDEC standards; This is not in some newsletter you can dismiss, it appears to be a direct posting of the docket in the case. What wonderful news, Rambus may be reduced to collecting royalties on Rambus memory. Now there is a revenue stream to pity. Paul