SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shoibal Datta who wrote (43827)3/15/2001 9:17:17 PM
From: Cary Salsberg  Respond to of 70976
 
In 1996, I bought semi-equips from the beginning of June, through the bottom at the end of July. They didn't take off until the end of November.

In 1998, I bought semis and semi-equips from January through October. An example: LRCX @ 23 in Jan, 21.5 in Jun, 20 in Jun, 18.13 in Jul, 16.5 in Jul, 15.31 in Oct (these prices are before the last 3-1 split).



To: Shoibal Datta who wrote (43827)3/15/2001 9:38:14 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
I assume you mean the market in general.
It's nearly identical to 73-74. There have been periods of panic, but folks are damaged much more severely by this type of never ending grind.

The reality is that there may not be enough sellers left in tech stocks to create what you might see as a panic. I said "may not be." It has been replaced by a steady erosion for about 9 months. If there is one final leg down as low as 1500, it will have to be driven by the public capitulating in a fashion that causes massive selling by funds as a result of redemptions. I think that is all that is left. I have some stats to support this view from two institutions I am associated with. If this occurs, no one will do well for years, even if they nail the bottom. There won't be enough demand left to drive prices up at any decent clip.

A minor version of this could drop us to under 1800, driven by tax selling in the next 4 weeks. It won't be caused by capital gains, or panic, but by folks who need to raise cash because of exercised options last year, and have to pay real income tax on the options.

I have based much of my direction as an investor on monetary policy. As much as anyone you would run into,I believe in the ability of the money supply to control economic direction. I can see we are falling off the cliff into an abyss, and yet, in my opinion, this is still correctable, and rather quickly(months). I just don't see Greenspan doing it, yet. So I go back and forth every day as to what will happen because this could turn on a dime with a huge pumping of supply but probably won't. When we look back on this I can assure you it will look like he was fighting inflation right through negative gdp numbers. Oh he lowered rates all right, but the adjusted monetary base is still negative year over year, and with the population increase, the numbers are even worse.

stls.frb.org



To: Shoibal Datta who wrote (43827)3/16/2001 7:36:31 PM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 70976
 
It's almost as if [the market] been "tolerized" to [fear]

Are you saying that the market seems to be developing an immunity to fear? I have been unable to find a definition of tolerize on the web, so I went to Google and extrapolated. Perhaps someone with academic access to OED online might be able to provide an "official" definition, if indeed the OED has included it yet. If not, an immunology textbook definition would be helpful.