SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: charred water who wrote (67810)3/15/2001 5:05:49 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 93625
 
Hi charred water; You're looking in the wrong patents. The correct patent application to look into is the original one filed in 1990, not the divisionals. The one with the 20 references where "bus" wasn't mentioned is a divisional from long after JEDEC SDRAM.

For those who haven't been paying attention, what happened is this:

(1) Rambus' original patent did not cover SDRAM. Instead they were for RDRAM.

(2) JEDEC designed SDRAM, avoiding any RDRAM infringement by not multiplexing the data bus.

(3) Rambus modified their patents to cover SDRAM by fooling the patent office.

(4) Rambus sued for royalties.

(5) Infineon asked that the terms (Markman) of the original 1990 patent be used, as that was the public disclosure required for patents, not the submarine versions.

(6) Rambus asked that the terms (Markman) of the later divisional patents be used, as that was what covered SDRAM.

(7) The judge verbally granted Infineon's Markman request. (yesterday)

(8) The stock crashed. (today, sort of like the wily coyote when he suddenly realizes that he has no solid ground under himself)

Got it?

-- Carl