SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RON BL who wrote (132014)3/15/2001 6:14:05 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769667
 
That guy is fully nutz and an absolute disgrace.



To: RON BL who wrote (132014)3/15/2001 6:18:04 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769667
 
More from that nut case:

60 Minutes" executive producer Don Hewett tells Daily Variety's Armey Archerd of his " 'shock' that the same media that have barred cigarettes have failed to ban political commercials." Archerd quotes Hewitt as saying: "If the First Amendment does not give you the right to holler 'Fire!' in a crowded theater, why does it give you the right to holler 'Money' in a Buddhist temple?"

Wow, Don, that's really brilliant. For that matter, where do people get off hollering "Praise the Lord" in a crowded church, "Go team" in a crowded stadium or "Fore!" on a crowded golf course? Does Hewett really mean to suggest that political advertising, like yelling "Fire!" in a theater, is likely to set off a panic? Or is this just a case of employing a cliché in the absence of a thought?

Hewett also tells Archerd: "If we get the NRA out of the way, responsible people will find a way to respect the Second Amendment and keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them." We eagerly await Hewitt's explanation as to how he plans to get groups he disagrees with "out of the way."

opinionjournal.com

Yesterday we noted "60 Minutes" executive producer Don Hewitt's curious remark about campaign ads: "If the First Amendment does not give you the right to holler 'Fire!' in a crowded theater, why does it give you the right to holler 'Money' in a Buddhist temple?"

Reader Tim Graham notes that this is not Hewitt's first foray into First Amendment jurisprudence. In 1999, as Brent Bozell noted, Hewitt offered the following penetrating analysis: "The First Amendment has never stopped anyone from refusing to broadcast or print obscenities, and I contend that political commercials are just that--obscenities--and could be banned for that reason alone."

OK, we are going to try our hand at Hewittian constitutional analysis. Clausewitz said war is politics by other means, and political ads come into our houses! So they blatantly violate the Third Amendment!

opinionjournal.com



To: RON BL who wrote (132014)3/15/2001 8:32:15 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
RonBL re:" blatant contradictions is the new mysticism that is greater than Jesus walking on water"

Water....walking on it? Isn't that a contradiction? Any evidence?