Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REH who wrote (67846)	3/15/2001 7:23:33 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 93625

i didn't say infineon was guiltless. i did say that an impartial source said rmbs must face the music AND attorney client privilege has been revoked! what a ROUTE!

To: REH who wrote (67846)	3/16/2001 11:09:58 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

>>what are you reading???<< apparently something too difficult for you to comprehend... ------------------------- Judge Allows Rambus Racketeering Allegations: Sploosh! Bottom Falls Out Of RMBS Stock By Mike Magee There was painful news for Rambus shareholders yesterday after the judge in the case said Infineon lawyers could introduce allegations of criminal activity in an up-and-coming jury trial that originally focused on alleged patent infringements. Dow Jones, picking up on earlier stories from The Register and Electronic News, said Judge Robert E. Payne had decided allegations of criminal misconduct could be discussed, despite an attempt by Rambus to prevent that discussion. Meanwhile, Rambus' share price plunged by nearly 32 per cent yesterday, to close on Wall Street at $24.09 after news reports and warnings from brokers caused over 20 million shares to be traded in a single day. The average number of shares traded in RMBS a day amounts to around 3.5 million. The slide started yesterday morning, after a report in Electronic News suggested that a judge had issued a ruling limiting Rambus' alleged patent infringement case against Infineon over DDR and SDRAM technology. According to CBS Marketwatch (of whom more, anon), SG Cowen also issued a note to its clients about that ruling. But, according to Rambus representatives contacted by The Register, no such ruling has been made. A brief statement from Rambus said: "We've seen no ruling out of the court yet." Meanwhile, Ramboids* all across the world responded to the fall in price of their favourite share by flaming both this organ and Electronic News. Perhaps somewhat unwisely, Shawn Langlois of CBS Marketwatch repeated some of these flames in his own piece called March Madness, Rambus Style. Quoting one flamer, Langlois said: "The news source [Electronics News] is paid marketing and if you search out the news source you will find they hold fake seminars and sell advertising and 'editorial' expertise. The 'news story' is crap plain and simple, paid for crap. And backing it up with the Register is like getting the National Inquirer to let us in on Roseanne's real life story." We're not sure where, in the pecking order, that puts Dow Jones or the WSJ. Yesterday, Michael Buettner of DJ wrote a story which followed up both our and Electronic News' stories. Electronic News is part of the rather well respected technology group that also publishes The Microprocessor Report, that is, Cahners. And The Reg is part of Szechuan Publishing International, of course, and so an even tougher nut to crack. EN appears to substantially stand by its earlier story, according to this Bloomberg tale. The ENstory has changed, however. The original had a reference and a link to The Register concerning crime-fraud allegations which has now been edited out, and Fyffe, the reporter, is maintaining that his original story limiting the scope of Rambus arguments, is essentially true. ® * Register Factoid 111 There are some fine, very fine people who buy and sell Rambus shares. But there is also a splenetic and vitriolic version, producing some of the Finest Flames of the Week we've ever seen fit to print. And it is these who are Ramboid. theregister.co.uk ------------------------ WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Judge Restricts Scope Of Terms In Rambus Patent Case By MICHAEL BUETTNER Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES RICHMOND, Va. -- The federal judge presiding over a patent infringement lawsuit filed here by Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has issued a memorandum limiting the definitions of several key terms in the dispute, generally agreeing with the arguments of defendant Infineon Technologies AG (IFX). In a memorandum of opinion signed Thursday but only made available Friday morning, Judge Robert E. Payne explained the legal constructions he will allow in the trial, which is scheduled to begin Tuesday. Among the key terms in the dispute, Payne wrote that he will consider that "the term 'bus' means a multiplexed set of signal lines used to transmit address, data and control information." Rambus had sought a broader interpretation construing "bus" to mean any lines or wires connecting memory devices. Payne's memo also tended to support Infineon's views on other technical terms involved in Rambus' dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, patents, including "block size," "read request" and "integrated circuit device."