To: Barry Grossman who wrote (67917 ) 3/16/2001 3:46:03 AM From: Barry Grossman Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625 And the latest revised version of the original story is, as of 12:40 am pst, on the now once again working website:electronicnews.com A judge is expected to issue an official pre-trial ruling limiting the scope of Rambus Inc.’s patents in the U.S. court case against Infineon Technologies AG, according to industry sources close to the case. Yesterday, sources told Electronic News a ruling had been made. However, no written ruling has yet been issued, but “an order is in the making,” a court clerk said today. [of course it is since the Markman hearing was on 2/26 and today is 3/16! Duh!] Judge Robert E Payne, who is hearing the case in the U.S. District Court in Richmond, Va., would kill Rambus’ (nasdaq: RMBS) royalty claims on SDRAM and double data rate (DDR) memory if he accepts testimony from Infineon’s expert witness , sources said. [Gee, I wonder who these sources could be. Could it be.... SATAN! Or... is the we in the next sentence the givaway? I mean after all, what would one expect the defendant in the case to say here?] “(The Markman) testimony was that the Rambus patent is a multiplex bus, and that we don’t use the multiplex bus in our SDRAM or DDR products,” the source said. “It means that because we don’t use the multiplex bus they use in their patents…we are not in violation of their patents.” Micron Technology Inc. and Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. Ltd. use the same bus architecture as Infineon. Rambus would not comment for this story. ------------ So, what do we have here? The source of the "news" appears to be Infineon themselves. Now if that fact had been represented in the original story, does anybody think that it would have gained the credibility it obviously did by being reported as coming from "industry sources". Why would anybody think that a party in the case would think otherwise than what their position is before a decision is announced one way or the other. Fyffe is no journalist. Fyffe is a paid shill not worthy of being paid any attention too but unfortunately the internet and Reed-Elsivier/Cahners have chosen to report as news the opinions of one side of the suit. Where are real journalists when you need them? Barry