Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (49232)	3/16/2001 9:20:40 AM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

Mr/Ms.Blue, First you make claims with certainty as though they are a priori truths. Then, rather than considering that you might not know something and allowing yourself time to devote to the subject, you throw out an off-the-wall link to health insurance benefits. . . [which doesn't back your claim in the least bit]. . .as though it is somehow proof positive. Then you continue, as though your eyes and ears are sewn shut. . . stating, "there is also no doubt that the Federal Reserve System is a creature of Congress." I am saying THERE IS DOUBT!! Answer this: 1. How many times has legislation been introduced that calls for a Congressional Accounting of the Federal Reserve System? 2. How many times has there been an congressional audit of the Federal Reserve? I have not stated that I believe all conspiracy theories. And because the FED is totally misunderstood by the people, it is worthy of further investigation and questions. And sometimes those questions follow the lines of conspiracy. Yet you were quick to make the assumption that because I believe one thing, I necessarily believe them all. I am open to read and hear proof-positive. I started this topic, because there were too many unanswered questions. We, here at HOME, seek truth. And we do not take anything at face value, but prefer to DD intrinsic value. The source I linked is merely a frame of reference of the current thinking going in the U.S. today. Nothing more. Now if you were receptive and open-minded, you might be asking more questions. Instead, you are filling questions with answers based on your assumptions. . . which are embarrassing. But to then take a condescending tone with me is unwarranted and insulting. I showed you the laws, and either you know how to read the US code or you don't. When I have time I'll find you something easier to read. . . .I am not going to look for any more clues for you. I will not waste further time trying to teach you. Do not respond to me again, until you have researched the subject for a week or two. Sincerely, Rande Is