Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jmac who wrote (67946)	3/16/2001 10:43:10 AM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Well I am 54 so I have about 10 years to get back I am down about 70 percent from the high..<g> This too shall come to pass.. Bought some April 30's(calls) for 2.00 today.. Still holding 10 contracts(March 30 puts) that expire today. You want to look at a couple strong stocks that have held well look at ELNK(just broke a Triple top yesterday) AVNT, and LLL.. Will surely be leaders when this thing turns..

To: jmac who wrote (67946)	3/16/2001 11:16:32 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

>>We're living through a NASDAQ depression<< jmac, nope. we're living through the guaranteed consequences of a bubble. i've argued for several years that there has NEVER been a bubble that ended well. in all of human history. btw, naz stocks are still double or triple average historical valuations. IF the pendulum swings BOTH ways - and it normally does eventually - this biggest of all historical bubbles will bring the biggest of all busts. simple cause and effect. i hope it doesn't happen. i just hate betting against 100% odds in human history (for a bad ending) and i feel uncomfortable betting against "the size of the bust is in direct proportion to the size of the bubble." we may escape the latter. i hope we do. however, to call double and triple normal historical norms a "depression" just isn't accurate.