SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shack who wrote (81461)3/16/2001 11:27:18 AM
From: JRI  Respond to of 436258
 
"Why is this bullish?" Old habits hard to break....Abbey says BUY! eom



To: Shack who wrote (81461)3/16/2001 11:34:45 AM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Shack:

I had thought of putting the snow shovel away for the year, until I got what I expected last night with respect to ADBE guidance (see yesterday's post). A snow shovel can efficiently handle the "fluffy" stuff whether it is on the ground or in the market. (g)

Best, Earlie



To: Shack who wrote (81461)3/16/2001 11:34:45 AM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 436258
 
Shack:

I had thought of putting the snow shovel away for the year, until I got what I expected last night with respect to ADBE guidance (see yesterday's post). A snow shovel can efficiently handle the "fluffy" stuff whether it is on the ground or in the market. (g)

Best, Earlie



To: Shack who wrote (81461)3/16/2001 11:36:13 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
SPX is probably in 5 here. I do not spend as much time on the SPX counting, but without looking at the wiggles and only the dailies, that's what I see.

They might get it to 1135 on this immediate leg, but I think it would be very hard to get it lower without an intervening rally to reset things again.

Inside this 5 there is an alternate count for me that shows us having a very long 1 and are now atually in only 3 of this 5. My God that would be brutal in the short-term.

Still, call me cautious at these levels, but I prefer the non BK count.