Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (81737)	3/16/2001 4:27:26 PM
From: AllansAlias	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Thanks patron. Nice post. See the last two minutes. Boy, how can they let stuff like this slip by. It's blatant. Let's see if some of those put-holders complain. -ng

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (81737)	3/16/2001 5:19:28 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Hi Patron, re Nonsense. This sort of stuff is just your average, orderly, efficient market action at work!<wink, wink> I talked to a poot option writer on SI about a year ago ELMER. I had been reading his taunts on the AMD thread and found him to be an open and honest guy. Of course in those days, poot option writers made easy money. He told me he wrote poot options on lots of stocks. He made several points that few took seriously. I believe him though. (1) Even on big trading stocks like INTC, the stock can be influenced easily by the poot writers just by buying a few stocks on "speculation". (2) It does not require any "manipulation". The poot writer intelligently reads the stock action. If it looks as if a few guys are buying it up, so what if he buys up a few stocks himself. The only mistake I made was playing GE when I should of played IBM. Darn it -g- pearly.