Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KevRupert who wrote (4260)	3/16/2001 8:08:13 PM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6784

here's your deleted post.... To:advalorem who wrote (4259) From: advalorem Friday, Mar 16, 2001 7:54 PM Respond to of 4260 Embarrassed: I'm embarrassed that nobody confronts Tom Clarksburg and his postings that he knows the numbers for Palm, and that we should ignore corporate guidance and that his opinion is that a Palm analyst is an "idiot" for having such low quarterly guidance for Palm. I confront his postings because they are so outlandish but appear to be so accepted on this thread. I don't care who wins the PDA industry: I just love innovation. I haven't seen it from Palm. And I'm not too terribly excited about a Palm with a flash memory slot that competitors have offered for over a year. How many people have: 1) noticed any tech blowups in recent months? 2) noticed that Palm is losing market share? 3) the economy is slowing down? Why people can read SI and let Tom post his tulipmania postings and not pin him down on facts is ridiculous. Investors need to appreciate or consider Palm's guidance in this type of economy. I expect attacks about this posting. (Vs. other factors: suggestions of a slowing PDA industry; Palm's valuation; slowing economy; lawsuit; competitive factors (whether it is Linux or C/E; product offerings; losing market share in the U.S. and Europe; profit margins, etc.).