Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Drillbits & Bottlerockets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (5614)	3/16/2001 8:52:06 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15481

cool, are we expecting a ruling by the third friday in April?

To: Rich1 who wrote (5614)	3/16/2001 10:38:17 PM
From: Junkyardawg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15481

I'm no expert but in my opinion the stakes are too high with this case. I can't see either company going the distance. Its just too big of a gamble. Even though they are in trial I still say they settle before the jury comes in. I have no position in RMBS but this is one of the most interesting stories in the market this year. The basic question is...can a company that has a legitimat patent be denied its rights no matter how or why they got those patents? I say shame on the other companies. RMBS was smart enough to get the patents and they deserve the full rights to them. Lamar