SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hank who wrote (3791)3/17/2001 12:26:47 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5582
 
So much pathetic drivel. You came into this with your mind closed and no fact would change it. There is no independent confirmation from Turner about anything. He suggests that to satisfy him the tests would have to be done in a different manner and that "such dramatic results would have to be replicated". So what! There is no test that would satisfy you. Another so what!

The wild virus study did stand up to peer review scrutiny and was published in a journal which was hardly of "low quality"...LOL. Words are cheap and yours are tainted. To impugn Dr Hirt, the company and the publication is just another low life self effacing tactic from someone unworthy even of cyberspace.

More and more people use the product because it works for them. That will continue to become evident to all but those ostriches such as yourself who will keep their heads buried in the sand. Another so what!

You're back on ignore.



To: Hank who wrote (3791)3/17/2001 5:57:52 PM
From: Troutbum  Respond to of 5582
 
Or could it be that Dr. Turner: 1) is really incompetent as a scientist or 2) intentionally conducted a flawed review of Dr. Hirt's study in order to cast doubt on Zicam's effectiveness.

Anyone can have it their way by twisting words around. And in no way does Dr. Turner's opinion constitute evidence of fraud. It's strictly an opinion based on no factual evidence. Try again.