Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ahda who wrote (66052)	3/18/2001 6:39:50 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116924

Yes, all of those Republican war mongerers of the 1900's. Let's see, Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Bush, and Clinton. Hey, one out of six--not bad. Clinton sprayed the Yugoslav landscape with uranium depleted tank-buster shells, poisoning thousands--even his own peacekeeping troops. The Western land grab must have been penance to the environmentalists for his sins. Well then, let's go back another century and add Lincoln--now there's a war mongering Republican for you. Er, wasn't he supposed to try and save the nation though? Actually the first year of Bush's tax plan targets low income workers. I don't see how he can be blamed for talking us into a recession when the stock market had already been falling for six months before the election and economists were predicting a slowing economy going into the fourth quarter of last year. I didn't vote for Bush, but he's far better than the clown who preceeded him IMO. "The point is wealth finds a way to shelter wealth no matter what party you belong to. " Exactly.