SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry S. who wrote (30098)3/18/2001 10:29:37 PM
From: Larry S.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 53068
 
Sobriety: -

March 18, 2001

Market Watch: The Future Won't Be as Good as
It Was

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON

trillions of dollars in household wealth
has vanished in the sickening stock
market fall of the past year. College education
funds have been pounded and plans for early
retirements probably pushed back as a result.
But apart from some finger-pointing and
gallows humor in investing chat rooms,
investors seem commendably stalwart about
the pain they have endured in this bear
market, the worst in Nasdaq's history.

Such investor stoicism is something of a
puzzle to many veteran market observers.
Since many novices entered the stock market
in the 1990's, it was assumed these
newcomers would panic and scream bloody murder when their beloved bull was
gored.

But calm and quiet prevails, at least on the surface of the market.

There are signs of suffering in indicators like consumer confidence and purchases of
consumer goods and capital goods, argued Peter J. Tanous, president of Lynx
Investment Advisory Inc., a money management concern in Washington. "My sense
is that the anguish that people are feeling, they are keeping to themselves because
the losses are so big," he said. "Investors are internalizing the pain but it's being
reflected in the economy. People are sitting on their hands and their wallets."

Mr. Tanous, author of "Investment Gurus: A Road Map to Wealth From the
World's Best Money Managers," makes investor psychology something of a study.
He fears that many investors are holding onto decimated stocks in the hopes that
they will make a quick comeback, as some have in the past.

A big mistake, in Mr. Tanous' view. And he provides a bit of arithmetic to
demonstrate why.

Take a popular stock like Intel, which has fallen 63 percent from its high of $75.81
in August. Many investors feel that Intel's dominance in microprocessors makes it a
prime comeback candidate.

Assume that Intel's shares rise 15 percent a year going forward, an enviable return
by any investor's reckoning. How long would it take for the shares to get back to
their high of just seven months ago?

Seven long years.

Plug in the same assumptions of 15 percent annual returns for the rest of the most
popular shares in America and the picture is sobering indeed. These stocks may
certainly come back, but if they do, it will more likely be over a period of years, not
months.

At 15 percent a year, Cisco shareholders would need to wait a decade for their
stock to get back to its high of $82, seen last March. AT&T would climb back to its
peak of last March in seven years. General Electric, which has lost a relatively
modest 33 percent since its peak of last August, would need three years to return
there.

Microsoft would see $115 again in six years, while Oracle shareholders would have
to wait nine years to regain their shares' peak. Nine years would also have to pass
before Sun Microsystems stockholders would again see the stock's high of $64.66.

Because it has fallen so precipitously in the past year, Yahoo would require even
more patience from its stockholders: 20 years of 15 percent gains.

This exercise is not meant to advise investors to dump these shares. Rather, Mr.
Tanous wants to show how investors will have to temper their expectations and
learn to be satisfied with the lower returns that are more typical of the stock market.

While pundits and strategists quibble over whether the market has bottomed or has
further to fall, Mr. Tanous said investors should instead bury any notion they may
harbor that the bull market of the last decade will stir again.

"I can state with a great degree of conviction that most of us will never see a decade
in the market like the '90's in our lifetime again," Mr. Tanous said. "And until
investors taper their expectations to more normalized returns, they're going to be in
for trouble."



To: Larry S. who wrote (30098)3/19/2001 9:16:38 AM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 53068
 
A bear on the cover of Time would indeed be
a very bullish signal. In the past Bears on magazine covers turned out to be the absolute bottom of the downtrend.

then again what the heck do I know?

chartseer