Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockHawk who wrote (40579)	3/19/2001 4:08:01 PM
From: Apollo	Respond to of 54805

SH: wonderful comments on the magic number...thank you. Apollo

To: StockHawk who wrote (40579)	3/19/2001 6:57:49 PM
From: BDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Re: the Magic Number and sustained withdrawals There is a table entitled "When Averages Don't Work" in a supplemental section called "Encore- A Guide to Life After 55" (page R13) of my edition of today's WSJ that I found interesting and pertinent to this discussion. "From 1969 to 1999, a balanced investment portfolio (60% S&P 500 Stocks, 30% bonds, 10% cash) had an average annual rate of return of about 12%. What did that mean for a nest egg of $250,000, allowing for annual withdrawals that started at $20,000 and grew 3% a year? In theory, a 12% return would turn $250,000 into about $440,000. In reality, because of weak returns in the early part of that 30-year period, that same nest egg would have been depleted after only 15 years. Had the sequence of annual returns been reversed, the outcome would have been much different: The nest egg would have grown to more than $1.5 million, again assuming annual withdrawals starting at $20,000 and rising 3% a year." I guess that means reality dictates that one has a buffer built into whatever Magic Number you choose. It also points out that recent returns (what we may have in mind when planning for retirement) have been above the norm.