Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (68586)	3/20/2001 7:43:41 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

carl: choice excerpt from asus review. ocworkbench.com "Also noticed that the results @ 142Mhz is worse than @ 133Mhz ? Well, I have enquire that and ASUS representative has told me "To keep the system stable, they reduced the memory timings when above 140Mhz FSB"." I guess that "ringing" in SDRAM/DDR memory buses takes a couple of extra clock cycles to die down at higher bus speeds. I, as a ee layman, interpert SDRAM signaling like being in wave pool. The quicker the waves come one after the other, the more you get buffeted. Not to mention the relected wave from other end of pool. RDRAM is more like skipping rope. As long as you can keep up with the uniformly rotating rope, higher speeds are possible. john