Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noneyet who wrote (34908)	3/20/2001 6:50:46 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Man, that makes me sad. This in particular really speaks to me.: If I cannot make money on INTC, QCOM, RMBS and EXTR in the next three months, I will EXIT the market and never enter again because that means I have no idea what the Houses are doing. I wish he had. And I wish he'd encouraged his followers to do the same.

To: Noneyet who wrote (34908)	3/20/2001 7:02:53 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

'Ho ho ho,' to coin a phrase ... (borrowed from the CFZ, actually...I would never attempt to plagiarize anyone there or elsewhere <g>) Thomas, indeed. I know five. What is despicable is the attitudes ... discussion recently about taking responsibility for oneself ... always in a snide sarcastic vein. Couple of 'em 'over there.' 'Important', 'leader types.' The threads that moderate out 'naysayers' who, yes, CRITICIZE the attitudes, character and personalities of 'prominent' thread personas as related to the influence they cultivate have proven to ruin many of those that 'listened.' And 'respected' said 'leaders.' LOL. I thought that was a load of self-serving and sanctimonious crap the first time I saw such a reference. It's one thing to start a thread and discuss investing and moderate it. It's quite another to DEMAND 'respect,' rather than to command -- or earn -- it. 'b-i-a' ###