Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (130518)	3/20/2001 7:18:07 PM
From: maui_dude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Article : Intel CEO Still Hopes for Second Half PC Rebound. dailynews.yahoo.com Nah, Am not gonna get my hopes up! Maui.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (130518)	3/20/2001 7:54:31 PM
From: stribe30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tench: re paper launches Why dont you read this little excerpt from JC's .. perhaps it will help you regain some objectivity. --------------------- First off, a little explanation for the previous two pages. I wanted to, in a roundabout sort of way, illustrate to you that these two companies are not altogether different in nature. I know that I keep hearing AMD fanatics (the precise term for this is "AMDroids", for reasons that I have not entirely worked out yet) complaining about constant Intel "vapour [or paper] launches", while Intel freaks (affectionately referred to as "Intelabees" by the other side) viciously comment about lack of reliability with AMD components. Well, it's time to set the record straight. You have it all wrong. AMD is the one who makes the partless launches, while Intel has the crappy quality. Er, and vice-versa. They're really all just the same. I wouldn't be caught dead with an i820 chipset, or a PIII-1.13 processor (both of which are known for, well, having reliability problems). In the meantime, where the hell is the legendary (mythical, actually) 'C' revision of the Athlon processor, and the chipsets that go with it? Did we forget that these parts were announced nearly five months ago and only recently became semi-available? You see, there's credence to both sides having paper launches and there's plenty of shaky evidence to support that both sides make unreliable products and are supported by companies making unreliable products from time to time. But I, right now, call a moratorium on these silly attacks. Neither AMD nor Intel have exclusive rights to unstable/unreliable/insecure products, and neither Intel nor AMD have patented the concept of vapour products. Anybody trying to single out one platform over the other in these categories.... ....is an idiot. jc-news.com

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (130518)	3/20/2001 8:03:50 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten I have no specific info on Palomino but I do sure hope that it would have lower power consumption than pIII. 60W? What is the power consumption of "mobile" pIII when operates at 1Ghz? Whenever you, bees, see "intel approved" you scream of a better quality regardless the price and whenever you see "amd approved"..... "sour grapes", yep, indeed they are sour since I am an intel investor as well. Intel should try to do less of marketing on put more pressure on you guys for technology :-)) Regards -Albert ps intel released this wonderful mobile chip just because they expected amd to release one. Amd will release the mobile palomino when they will be good and ready pss do not forget this 20 intel construction sites :-))

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (130518)	3/20/2001 10:40:06 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten - Re:"Albert, if you haven't noticed," Albert is a flame-bait artist who notices nothing. While AMD melts away, along with Intel of course, he just throws out flame bait and then goes back to the AMD Mod thread to masturbate... and suffer losses. Other 'Droids do much the same -- Albert is just one of the more obvious, silly offenders. Teenage conduct is Albert's forte. Perhaps someone should give Tony Soprano a call about Albert.