Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (66364)	3/21/2001 3:34:35 PM
From: Ahda	Respond to of 116951

We go back to definition of moral that which does not harm man. I don't watch TV my children don't have a TV set and they can well afford one. My Grandchildren live with books as entertainment. It is the choice of their family. I don't advocate TV that is brutal but then I feel rights lie with parents. I hope they have the wisdom to turn the thing off or deal with the results of it. It is their choice. Moral majority, I could of zippered Clinton up to the point called castration, but that is my view. To me elders should be wise there actions committed to the actions that aid and abet youth to success. Sexual desire diminishes but knowledge shared addresses the long range goals of the future that benefit all. I did not feel this aided the future. I would of preferred Clinton assisted in education of Academic nature not Biology which I feel is not an appropriate field for the White House to specialize in and the press to expand upon. To use religion as base for gold movement the sentiment attached to the moral end of the possible why movement is not a concern for me. I have no sentiment when I look at the escalation of prices in my area. I see what is.