SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (68701)3/21/2001 5:51:22 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Sure they were. That is why the Infineon witnesses said they did not know about Rambus technology and that Rambus submarined them. <LOL>

I can see why your meeting lasted so long this morning.
It looks like you got JEDEC to go along with the scam on Rambus.

In any event the JEDEC defense is dead along with the RICO issues and all that is left is "willful infringement."
Treble damages sounds real good to me after this scam.

Perhaps, it is time for you to load up on Rambus stock.



To: Bilow who wrote (68701)3/21/2001 5:56:08 PM
From: Jerry Miller  Respond to of 93625
 
"the industry was honestly attempting to avoid Rambus IP when designing SDRAM."

but they weren't successful.



To: Bilow who wrote (68701)3/21/2001 6:24:33 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 93625
 
Carl, since the patents were not yet published in April 1992, the industry efforts to get around the technology must have been based on "private peeks" under NDA. Every NDA I know of has a "non use" clause, using that information to get around the IP, is using and a breach of contract. Furthermore, Infineon in view of these documents can be found to "wantonly" violate Rambus IP rights, since they did not do it "by mistake" but design many alternative strategies as to how to do it, I believe that if they are found to infringe, wanton infringement grade treble damage.

Zeev