Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (9424)	3/22/2001 1:16:53 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 82486

I like reading your posts and posting to you. I don't know you personally. "You may assume I do not like you." I already did. "You say you feel solid in your position. But your position seems to rest completely on your defining things to fit your argument. Is this the solid position you mean? Your tone on this has been very critical (ie "definitions out of air"). For that reason I suspect a set up here but; sure, I guess so as long as the definitions apply and are defensible. Sorry if referencing e-bill gave you a jab. That wasn't my intention. He simple confirmed for me that the teasing comment was perceptible. "I am merely looking for the logical errors." So, what is illogical in saying that there would not be a "Who" necessary to design the designer since the designer is eternal?