Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (50480)	3/22/2001 1:28:09 PM
From: Jeff Mizer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

as I lurker I would comment that if the Nas goes to 500 we may as well have gotten wiped out by the y2k bug as we are going to be in big heap of doo doo. As owner of a business relying on people buying big ticket items we are reaching serious state of buyer psychology that needs desperately to see good news to start a reverse of things. If Nas goes under 1500 this is going to be a disaster-- IMHO we need a turnaround and strong leadership and sadly I think even if Bush wanted to be bold The dems would sabotage and try to blame him for this mess. I hope Washington will rally together for all our sakes.

To: Rarebird who wrote (50480)	3/22/2001 2:10:25 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Just as I thought - the world is coming to an end. Baloney and hype? Only from the over-excited, over-confident bears. What next? Predictions of 15% unemployment and massive deflation? Wheelbarrows of money to buy the bread you have to wait in line for? Or is it massive INflation? Better buy that gold now! Chiken Little isn't such a rare bird these days. 1000! 500! 200! Run awaaaaayyyy!!! BTW, I was looking for a slightly more specific answer - what trailing and forward earnings are you using to support your argument that contracting PEs will bring the Naz down by another 83%?