Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (7130)	3/23/2001 11:37:21 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

You have shaken my faith to it's very core...NOT. The equation looks something like this, one horse plus two donkeys, equals one giant ASS. Ah that would be you now wouldn't it? If there was were two donkeys then there was also one donkey, the difference in the accounts shows there was no collusion on the part of the disciples. Try going into court with four identical eyewitness accounts of an accident, can we say insurance fraud? Whatever happened to your horse thief hypothesis????? Well the silence is deafening about that isn't it? Never mind the text explicitly says, "You shall say, The Lord has need of them, and immediately HE(the owner) will send them." Sounds like this heist was a bit of an inside job. Come on Solon, you can admit you were Wrrrrrrrrrr rrrr rr rong just this one little time can't you? Na I didn't think so. Amazing that every one of these supposed blatant contradictions you cite all have plausible explanations, but you are so desperate to find any excuse to not believe that you will even resort to making things up to slander God. Remember Jesus in the garden with the naked boys? You have plainly revealed yourself to be a spiteful and hate filled old man, who's argument are wholly without substance or merit. I will continue to pray for you. Greg