To: edamo who wrote (34560 ) 3/23/2001 11:28:43 AM From: r.edwards Respond to of 65232 u da man, e da mo, <g>,,, trying to download the who's Magic Bus from Napster,,,,,RMBS "still below the $35.35 it traded at prior to the judge's seemingly anti-Rambus ruling last Thursday. On March 15, the judge in that case defined a handful of terms that are used in the four patents at the center of Rambus' case. The judge's definition of these terms was designed to provide guidelines for the jurors, who may not have the technical expertise needed to understand terms regarding the construction of dynamic access random memory included in Rambus' patents. Rambus produces its own proprietary DRAM called Rambus DRAM, which isn't at issue in the lawsuits. Infineon makes synchronous DRAM and double-data rate DRAM, and Rambus believes those are based on its patents. The judge's definitions of some of these technical terms seemed to limit Rambus' ability to prove patent infringement. Then on the morning of March 16 the judge met with Infineon and Rambus lawyers and heard news that some Infineon documents had only recently been discovered and provided to Rambus. He agreed to Rambus' request for a delay and set the trial's start at April 10 instead of March 20. According to the transcript of that session entered into the public docket on March 21, Rambus asserted that the Infineon documents specifically pertain to Infineon's plan to use Rambus technology to produce a mass-market DRAM. In a note to clients Thursday morning, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter analyst Mark Edelstone wrote, "Based on the new evidence, we believe that the potential for Infineon to want to settle out of court has increased significantly." And Edelstone went on to say that this turn of events was "quite positive" for Rambus given the collapse in the stock last week surrounding the judge's decision about the patents"