SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_urchin who wrote (66481)3/24/2001 5:58:20 PM
From: Alex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116810
 
Bloodbath
Gee. Why doesn't someone make stock prices go up?
Stockmarkets around the world have been in freefall, with traders and investors in America, Japan and Europe scrambling to offload shares as concern grows about global economic prospects. Does the reaction to the latest American interes-rate cut mean Alan Greenspan has lost his touch?
JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES used to blame big stockmarket swings on what he called the 'animal spirits' of investors. Certainly, the herd-like behaviour of the markets has been on display this week, as shares plunged in one country after another. The rout started with the negative reaction in American markets to the Fed's announcement on March 20th that it was cutting interest rates by another half-percentage point. The high-tech Nasdaq, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the wider S&P 500 all fell sharply, reflecting traders' disappointment that the interest-rate cut was not bigger. European markets followed suit on Wednesday March 21st, recording very large falls. And then on March 22nd, markets in Europe and America plunged further. Even Japan's Nikkei index, initially cheered by signs that the authorities were starting to get a grip on the country's problems, started to slide again on Thursday. Despite a better day on Friday, markets ended a nerve-wracking week in a jittery state.

If the Fed's chairman, Alan Greenspan had been hoping to soothe stockmarket nerves by cutting rates, he has, at least for the moment, failed. There is a risk that the Fed will now be pushed into making further cuts in a way which will look as if the markets are dictating policy.

The latest reduction in American interest rates was the third in less than three months and was billed as part of the Fed's strategy of aggressive response to the downturn in the American economy. Mr Greenspan has noted several times in recent weeks that companies are now able to respond much more quickly to changes in the business environment, and that the economic impact of these shortened response times means the authorities have to act more quickly too. That's why the Fed took everyone by surprise on January 3rd when it first cut rates because of new data (the National Association of Purchasing Managers' Index) showing the slowdown was more severe than previously realised. But in spite of temporary pick-ups, the underlying trend in American stockmarkets has been relentlessly downward since before the turn of the year.

Of course, Mr Greenspan would be the first to admit that it is not the job of the Fed to prop up the markets. Indeed, there is much speculation about whether what is happening is still part of a correction to the spectacular rises in many share prices—especially those in the high-tech sector—and that the markets have further to fall before they reach levels more closely linked to appropriate valuations taking proper account of company earnings and other factors. One econometric model that tried to calculate these valuations, put together by the Centre for Business and Economics Research (CEBR) in London, comes up with some interesting figures. The model suggests that the Dow is, if anything, slightly below its appropriate level of 9,550, and that the FTSE 100 is now well below what it should be, 6,200; but that the high-tech Nasdaq still has some way to go, to about 1,500.

Of course, many analysts take a significantly different view, and such calculations can in any case only be approximate. Markets invariably overshoot both on the way up and on the way down. But the CEBR analysis implies that the Nasdaq might fall by another 15% or so, based on a more sober assesssment of the earnings prospects of high-tech companies than investors were making only a year ago.

Just over four years ago, Mr Greenspan himself spoke of the "irrational exuberance" of the markets. In the intervening years, they became even more exuberant, so the Fed chairman was presumably not averse to some sort of correction. But he now faces two, closely-related problems. One is simply the way in which the decline has been gathering speed. It may not be his job to offer a bail-out to investors by cutting rates whenever the market drops; but he might want to slow the speed of decline to prevent markets going into freefall and causing a financial crisis. Managing that, without appearing to be cutting interest rates in a panic, has become more difficult in the wake of the reaction to the latest cut.

Mr Greenspan's second worry, which is a concern for President George Bush as well, is the direct impact the stockmarket falls are having on the real economy. The economic outlook has rapidly become much gloomier in the past few months. Industrial production fell in February for the fifth successive month, hitting a level not seen since 1992 (when the economy was just emerging from recession). Inventories are up, showing that firms are still producing more than they are selling and making further cuts in production likely. Unemployment is now creeping up, albeit slowly. The Economist's own poll of private forecasters shows that they have been busily—and speedily—revising their forecasts of American growth in 2001 downwards: from 3.5% in October to 1.6% at the beginning of March. With nearly half of American adults owning shares, the "negative wealth effect" of falling stockmarkets encourages people to start saving again and cut back on spending. This in turn could worsen the downturn and delay recovery—something both Mr Greenspan and Mr Bush are anxious to avoid.

As if this gloomy scenario did not pose enough of a problem, there was further bad news for Mr Greenspan on March 21st, with figures showing that inflation was proving stubbornly high for an economy now slowing down sharply. This could limit the scope for further rate cuts, even as the pressure for them intensifies. Lower interest rates now might be the only way to halt the current stockmarket hysteria. But they will make the task of curbing inflation when the economy does start to recover even more difficult.

The Economist, March 23, 2001


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: sea_urchin who wrote (66481)4/2/2001 8:08:25 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116810
 
Searle, opinion please,

Impact on gold?

Monday April 2, 8:02 am Eastern Time
South Africa's richest tribe blasts new mining law
By Steven Swindells

JOHANNESBURG, April 2 (Reuters) - South Africa's richest tribe said on Monday the black-majority government's plan to seize mineral rights was comparable with the land seizures of former apartheid rulers.

The 300,000-strong Royal Bafokeng nation, whose wealth is founded on its platinum-rich lands in northwest South Africa, took out full-page ads in national newspapers to condemn new mining laws proposed by Pretoria.

Drawing parallels with forced land expropriations by white-minority governments and Boer republics of the nineteenth century, the Bafokeng said the bill would rob them of royalties paid by the world's biggest miners.

Pretoria's draft Minerals Development Bill aims to vest all mineral rights and royalties in state hands, potentially leaving the Bafokeng dependent on ministerial discretion for future royalty payments worth millions of dollars a year.

``It is a tragic irony that the mineral rights in such hard-won land, acquired in the face of dispossession and opposition to land ownership by blacks on the part of Boer and colonial authorities and later of successive (white) Nationalist (Party) governments, should now face expropriation without compensation,'' the Royal Bafokeng said.

The Bafokeng, or ``the people of the dew'', earn royalties from miners Impala Platinum and Anglo American Platinum who extract the white metal used in luxury jewellery from the more than 2,000 sq km (1,250 sq mile) of land owned by the tribe.

The tribe warned they faced ``incalculable harm'' and ``profound and devastating implications'' from the loss of the royalties which have funded an enviable social development programme that includes modern hospitals and schools.

Government minerals spokesman Kanyo Gqulu said the proposed bill was still open for discussion.

MISSIONARIES SECURED BAFOKENG LAND

The Setswana-speaking Bafokeng tribe were able to secure their lands through their ingenuity and the benevolence of Christian missionaries from the 1850s, when no one knew of the future mineral wealth locked below the soil.

To get around laws rules prohibiting black landownership, missionaries put the land into their own names and ensured the land was held for the tribe in trust.

Bafokeng tribesmen, who arrived in the region in the sixteenth century from modern-day Botswana, sold their precious cattle and worked in the new diamond mines of Kimberley to finance the original land purchases.

``The royalties from the land are vital...We have used them to re-buy more adjacent farms,'' a Bafokeng spokesman said.

MINERS SUPPORT BAFOKENG

Modern-day support for the Bafokeng's position on the mine bill came from miner Impala, the world's second biggest producer of platinum which has also objected to the proposed bill.

``We support the concerns they have about lack of clarity in the bill. We believe that the Bafokeng have used the royalty to uplift their community,'' said Impala spokeswoman Cathie Markus.

Some 80 percent of the land mined by Impala, which produces more than 1.1 million ounces a year of platinum, is owned by the Bafokeng. Under a ground breaking deal in 1999, Impala and the Bafokeng reached an agreement on royalty payments which included the transfer of one million shares -- worth $36 million at current prices -- to the tribe and board representation
biz.yahoo.com



To: sea_urchin who wrote (66481)7/29/2001 9:44:52 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116810
 
Searle,
Your take on the strike(s), the unions, the miners, how long before they settle?

Are their requests out of line or in line? What life style does their beginning pay fund? ... The whole nine yards for those of us not there, please.

richard



To: sea_urchin who wrote (66481)8/14/2001 5:40:17 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116810
 
Searle,

Could or will this happen?

Black South African Warns
Whites To 'Share' Their
Property With Blacks
By Ed O'Loughlin
Herald Correspondent in Johannesburg
8-14-1

White South African business should "share" more with blacks or risk Zimbabwe-style seizures, the country's leading black businessman has said.

Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, a senior figure in the ruling African National Congress and chairman of the TML media group, told the BBC that too much of South Africa's economy was still in white hands despite efforts at "black economic empowerment".

"If we don't do anything, if we don't move quick enough, yes, [Zimbabwe-style attacks on white farms and business] could happen. That is a fair warning," Mr Ramaphosa said.

"We want the white private sector in this country to heed that warning. Let us all be aware of the responsibility and share. Share what we have."

Zimbabwe has announced the seizure of 90per cent of white-owned farm land in an attempt to head off growing popular opposition to the 20 year-rule of President Robert Mugabe.

Eight white farmers have been killed by self-proclaimed liberation war veterans organised by Mr Mugabe's party. Another is in critical condition following an axe attack at his home on Monday.

In recent months South Africa's President Thabo Mbeki has been criticised at home and abroad for failing to condemn attacks on whites and opposition supporters in Zimbabwe.

This year Government supporters, who call themselves veterans of Zimbabwe's war of independence, have spread their intimidation campaign from farms to white-owned businesses and foreign aid agencies. Foreign investors' fear of "contagion" from Zimbabwe has contributed to the South African currency's big slump on international markets.

Mr Ramaphosa said previous efforts to boost black participation in the private economy had not gone far enough. As chairman of the Black Economic Empowerment Commission he recently called for new legislation to force white business to share more of its wealth with black business people.

Mr Ramaphosa, formerly leader of the National Union of Mineworkers, quit active politics after losing out to Mr Mbeki in the contest to succeed former president Nelson Mandela.

He became one of South Africa's wealthiest blacks through the first round of post-apartheid "black empowerment" deals, in which white-owned conglomerates sold off chunks of stock to well-connected black entrepreneurs in supposed "sweetheart" deals.

Although at one point the resulting "black chip" corporations controlled 10 per cent of the Johannesburg stock market, this has slumped to about 2per cent.

Mr Mbeki has again baffled doctors and AIDS activists by declaring that violence rather than the AIDS epidemic sweeping Africa is the main cause of death in his country.

Official figures show South Africa with one of the highest murder rates in the world, with 22,000 of its 40 million people murdered each year. Another 10,500 die in road accidents. However, the United Nations estimates 7million South Africans will die of HIV/AIDS in the next decade, an average of 700,000 a year.

It is estimated that one in 10 people carries the virus.

Asked if he accepted that AIDS, rather than racism or corruption, was the greatest threat to his country, Mr Mbeki told the BBC that he had learned that more than half of South Africans who died between the ages of 16 and 64 were killed by violence.

smh.com.au

rense.com