Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : NetCurrents NTCS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cybersaavy who wrote (6573)	3/25/2001 2:10:46 AM
From: milesofstyles	Respond to of 8925

cybersaavy geocities.com i posted a couple thoughts there. can i ask why you would adjust your fibonacci setup to that higher low instead of maintaining it on the dbl btm that occurred prior? it would seem since the point you reference is a higher low, that you are only fibb'ing a portion of the whole move instead of the entire move? i put some arrows on the chart that seem to fit the fib/dbl bottom start point, appreciate yer thoughts. its funny and maybe over kill, but i can argue a triangle, an ihs, and a dbl top! regarding the lower high on 3-23 where i left the trendline on, (basically becuz its the first lower high) i would say most people adjust their line outwards as you did. and i will add that line as well, but why do people remove the prior lines? here's a csco daily chart that is typical of leaving the lines in place for me, notice lines a and b, then notice all the activity indicated by the arrows along those two lines. sometimes its overkill, sometimes it seems to work. prolly not yer textbook use of trendlines, but i find them interesting often. its kind of a discretionary thing as to when i remove lines, usually based on how bars treat the line in the future. ie, the 9-1-00...9-21-00 line i still have on as the original lower high, should be removed at this point. geocities.com thx milesov