Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (66493)	3/25/2001 8:25:28 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 116762

Rare, <<thinkers on its staff>> Doesn't that come from playing football without a helmet? LOL

To: Rarebird who wrote (66493)	3/25/2001 7:42:44 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

"... in a court of Law. Proof not speculation is required to convict..." Rarebird, The following bad English grammer 3 line sentence, and B4u complain bout it considered that it's form could have taken a train of thoughts as long as a train in ChucaSpeak where sentences become send-senses, and eventhought many have seened the words, most all have not taken aTime required 2C what they aRead. But lets leave this tang'ing tangent, as the send'ism of a Chuca are not to make one senseless or created sensationalism, but to learn help show educate question without boundaries where all people are equal to help and receive from all people. ok, enough of that, as 4 most its 2 2 enough Recently i sent to Searle in jest the following, now insert your name and receive without aJoke. "ok, back to South Africa and Searle where i now point out that his comments about Great One Gata Bill's activity makes it clear that in the "Game of Life", Searle is playing Checkers while gata is playing Chess." I'm in a "Bnice to ron-bon mood" so I'll end this post quickly. - a very short fiction story that can happen. The cool air in the court room felt hot whenever i looked at the face of accused person RareBird who now stands ready to hear the jury's verdict to what he has strongly declared without qualifications his total innocents. Like a blast of fire from a gas explosion, the person RareBird looked at "his" jury of equals that spoke the word guilty and he spoke to them not as an equal, saying to them that they do not understand, do not know what truth is as he knows from that which is required, a high intellect with years spent to obtain a Ph.D. in philosophy. This Rarebird said that his jury of equals to judge him, are not those "common" people who need the 6 o'clock news on t.v. to tell them what has and what is. But these words were not actually spoken out loud by Rarebird, as he realized that they would not understand, just as those who listened to John Galt's radio speech telling people that they have let their minds be taken by evil others, that fact in itself, that a person first let their mind be taken, and then allowed this in a false sense of safety to continue rather than fight, that these people existed as "not(s)" and only functioned for the purpose or agenda or thrill of evil others. So Rarebird, please tell me again who it is that will decide win or fail in the Howe/Gata lawsuit quest to free physical gold so that playing the markets to make good investmints will be to most an "after thought" once Good wins this battle with Evil. dougak