Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (9712)	3/25/2001 11:23:20 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

BTW AJ- I think that was naturally occurring Fluoride. Were you implying the Indian government added fluoride? It seemed you were, but there is no evidence of that in the article you posted. In the article it sounded like the Fluoride was naturally occurring. So the fault of the Indian government is a failure to diagnose and protect it's citizens so "What about when a city government adds chemicals to the water" seems like an extraneous question to me.

To: epicure who wrote (9712)	3/25/2001 9:36:28 PM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Find me one law firm that will take on a stock fraud manipulation case on a contingency fee retainer and I will work out a bonus for you. (providing of course I am not violating SI terms of use in that one time offer) You can't do it, I guarantee you can't do it. No law firm in their right mind (outside of Hollywood) would do it. The fluorine piece was simply to show it is lethal and that I don't trust the government to administer chemicals to me. I don't think you can sue mother nature, perhaps you could sue the government if they were aware of it and you could prove gross negligence.