Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (85249)	3/25/2001 7:41:24 PM
From: chic_hearne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I find your argument more along the lines of "this is the way it worked in the bull market". In Particular, these parts: AS with MSFT the revenues are not the issue but the Earnings. Qcom must be valued on Earnings not revenues.

To: marginmike who wrote (85249)	3/25/2001 9:05:40 PM
From: KeepItSimple	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

>At 35-40 Id buy Q and put it away for 10 years, This is a great mantra from sell-side analysts, applied to almost any worthless trash stock imaginable. They lifted the phrase from bank robbers, who often tell their victims to lay on the floor and count to 500 before getting up, or they will be shot. The purpose, in both cases, is to allow the robber to get out the door and be long gone by the time you finish waiting. Funny that people think it is sage advice when analysts tell them to do the same thing that armed felons do. Then again, maybe it isn't.