To: Craig Freeman who wrote (19820 ) 3/26/2001 10:55:01 AM From: Art Bechhoefer Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 60323 Craig, in regard to why Clinton predicted good news for the bond market some 8 years ago, remember that Clinton was getting advice from Rubin, who became one of the greatest, if not the greatest Secretary of the Treasury. Rubin and many others who were involved in the financial markets, knew that the lackluster economy in 1992 would eventually motivate the Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates. It is difficult to predict stock prices, but it is almost always true that bond prices go up when interest rates fall. In politics, moreover, one can always find a politician who takes credit for anything good that happens. No one has ever doubted that Clinton had a tremendous talent in that regard, irrespective of what they may think of his other attributes. As to why the semiconductor stocks as a group, including SNDK, have done so poorly over the last year, one should look at interest rates, factors influencing consumer confidence, as well as world economic and political conditions. Greenspan used "irrational exuberance" almost as an excuse for raising interest rates at a time when inflation was low and not increasing, but also at a time when he thought stocks were too high. As I have said countless times, Greenspan used the wrong tool to correct what he believed to be excesses in the stock market. You don't use interest rates, as that simply hog-ties the whole economy. Instead you increase margin requirements on stock purchases, forcing many investors to pull back a little. Such a prudent use of margin requirements (which are set by the Fed) would have helped push down what Greenspan thought were too high prices for stocks, without distorting the whole economy. Recall that Greenspan was still raising interest rates about six months ago, and it is well settled that the effect of interest rate changes takes about six months to work its way through the economy. Why the Fed refused to alter margin rates and instead concentrated on interest rates probably reflects the bankers' fear that of all the sins of the world, inflation is the worst. Myopia, if you ask me. Meanwhile, higher energy prices were competing for consumer dollars, forcing consumers to spend more on the essentials and less on the items such as computers and semiconductors which had driven the economy to new heights. The Fed ignored the changes in consumer buying habits and chose instead to regard higher energy prices as one more indicator of impending inflation. If one is looking for government actions to reverse the downturn, there are two possible policies to stimulate the economy IMMEDIATELY. A tax cut is one, but the across-the-board cuts favored by the Administration are truly inefficient and would have very little effect in the first year. If they really wanted to stimulate the economy through tax cuts, they would IMMEDIATELY cut the corporate income tax rate by at least 50 percent. This would either lower the price of products and services, since less taxes would be paid, increase profits and spur future investment, or discourage marginal investments, since the subsidy created by deductions from taxable corporate income would be much less. Thus, a corporate tax rate cut would both stimulate the economy AND be non-inflationary. Guess how many in Congress would go for such a policy. Many of us have some gripes about SNDK, in terms of whether it has any proprietary products, or even if it doesn't, why it is faced with inventory build-ups at a time when retail stores are in short supply of CF. But one area where SNDK stands out is its positive cash flow, and the fact that unlike many other rapidly expanding technology firms, it doesn't have to issue more stock or borrow more in order to finance its capital needs. Even though interest rates are coming down, not having to pay ANY extra interest gives a company a decided advantage over its competitors. Just look at the difference between SNDK and LEXR, as an example. With interest rates coming down, and with a tax cut in the offing (even if it won't be very effective), one can be sure that an experienced politician like W will take the cue from Clinton and take credit for the return to prosperity that will very likely take place slightly after the tax cut is passed, though not BECAUSE of the cut. As I say, it is almost routine that politicians will find a way to take credit for anything good that happens. And the public will believe!