SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (9788)3/26/2001 7:27:36 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Here's a poser... if - as does now look possible, in medium future - the totality of
a human experience can be transferred to a computerised system, so that it has
until transferral the same experiences, memories and reactions of the flesh
body, is it still human? If it thought it was?[LOL - and would it have a soul?]


A poser indeed.

And here's perhaps the ultimate question -- could it love? And would it be capable of risking its life to save another? Would male computers give up their places in the lifeboat to female and infant computers?

Humans are cpable of extraordinary acts of self-endangerment and even self-sacrifice to save the lives of absolute strangers. It makes no sense to endanger a hundred lives in a search for one lost hiker or skiier. But we do it. Thank goodness!

Until a computer can do that without logically justifying the act, it can't be human!



To: thames_sider who wrote (9788)3/26/2001 11:48:13 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
My answer is that, to be on the safe side, one should treat any being that acts credibly human as a a human. But not because I think that interiority (self- awareness) and self- determination are materially grounded, but because God might have infused the creature with a soul.