SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Deadheads -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JakeStraw who wrote (25716)3/27/2001 10:57:29 PM
From: SIer formerly known as Joe B.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 49844
 
Monday March 26, 6:18 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

Monterey International Pop Festival to be Reprised
June 15-17 by Performers, Celebrities and Fans in a
Symposium At the Historic Site

biz.yahoo.com

MONTEREY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 26, 2001--The Monterey History &
Art Association is sponsoring a three day symposium celebrating the legendary
Monterey International Pop Festival of 1967. Included in the event is a tribute to recently deceased John Phillips of The
Mamas and The Papas, a leader in creating the original festival. A photo and graphic exhibit enhanced with artifacts
from the original event will debut at the Monterey History Center during the Symposium and Country Joe McDonald,
Jorma Kaukonen and Jack Casady will perform live.

Timed to occur on the calendar weekend of the original event, Monterey Pop Revisited seeks to capture recollections
and personal experiences of what is considered a seminal event in the social and musical history of the U.S. Performers
already committed to attend include Joe McDonald, Barry Melton and David Cohen of Country Joe and the Fish, Andy
Kulberg of The Blues Project, Mark Naftalin of the Paul Butterfield Blues Band and Jack Casady and Jorma Kaukonen
of The Jefferson Airplane. Documentary filmmaker D.A. Pennebaker's acclaimed film of the festival, Monterey Pop
will be shown. Tom Wilkes, designer of the original Monterey Pop poster will participate, as will photographers of the
1967 event, Elaine Mays, Tom O'Neal and Lisa Law. Stage manager of the festival, Paul Viarrigi will also participate.
Bookings continue, but contributors already committed include Joel Selvin, Music Critic of the San Francisco
Chronicle and author of ``Monterey Pop'' and ``Summer of Love,'' John Morris, production director for Woodstock,
David Farber, author of ``The 60's From Memory To History'' and freelancer Matthew Greenwald, a contributor to
Rolling Stone On-Line and Crawdaddy. Information on the symposium may be found at www.popfestmonterey.com, by
calling 866/POP-FEST or e-mail at info@popfestmonterey.com.

Monterey Pop Revisited has 1,000 seats available for the symposium at The Monterey County Fairgrounds, site of the
original Festival. It is there where Pop Festival guitarist Jimi Hendrix's name remains carved by the artist backstage in
the Garden Arena. A large collection of seldom seen artifacts of the era, will be on view as part of a major exhibition
staged by the sponsors at The Monterey History Center. Concert promoter, Lou Adler has loaned items from his
personal collection to the exhibit. Elaine May, retiring chair of the photography department at Tisch School of the Arts,
New York University, was a young photographer working for Hullabaloo Magazine when assigned to cover the
Monterey Pop festival. Elaine's photos of the festival, some of them never published, are part of a large photo exhibit,
which will debut at the symposium.

Also contributing is Lisa Law, whose photographs are part of the permanent collection of the Smithsonian. The work of
Monterey resident Tom O'Neal, who designed and photographed over 100 album covers beginning in the late 60's, is
included in the exhibit. O'Neal's subjects included John Phillips, Mama Cass, B.B. King and Neil Young. The Monterey
Pop Revisited Exhibition will remain on view in Monterey from June until December 2001 at the Monterey History
Center.

The Monterey Pop Festival of 1967 predated Woodstock by two years. It was the first large rock festival and the first
charity rock festival. The music of Monterey Pop reflected changes in the attitudes of the 200,000 estimated young
people who arrived to participate in the weekend, some 50,000 of them at the Fairgrounds. This was the fabled summer
of love, a bellwether of social consciousness, which would ultimately change the course of the Vietnam War. Concert
promoters scattered 100,000 Hawaiian orchids over the fairgrounds from a plane flying overhead. Peace and love
reigned. For the musicians, it was a place of convergence with an unprecedented program combining soul, folk, rock
and psychedelic genres.

In part this was the desire of Beatle Paul McCartney who was a volunteer consultant to the event. The result was a
diverse program with Lou Rawls and Eric Burden & The Animals sharing the same billing. Others performing
included: The Association, Scott McKenzie, Canned Heat, Simon and Garfunkle, Big Brother & The Holding Company
with Janis Joplin, The Jimi Hendrix Experience, The Who, The Paupers, Al Kooper, Beverly, The Blues Project, The
Byrds, Laura Nyro, Otis Redding, Booker T. and The MG's, Ravi Shankar, The Grateful Dead, Steve Miller Blues Band,
The Paul Butterfield Blues Band, The Electric Flag, Hugh Masakela, Buffalo Springfield, Johnny Rivers, Quicksilver
Messenger Service, Eric Burdon & The Animals, Moby Grape, Country Joe and The Fish, The Mamas and The Papas
and The Band With No Name.

Of Monterey Pop performer Eric Burdon says, ``It was the only pop festival. Everybody else tried to copy Monterey,
copy the feeling. You can't copy feelings. ''It's like musicians jamming. You don't say, 'Ya wanna jam tonight?' If it's
planned, it's not a jam. But if you wait until there's a smile or a nod from the stage from a musician who has a space
open for you to move in and turn the people on, then that's jamming. And that's what happened at Monterey. Tommy
Smothers called the festival a 'tension of love' -- well, that's what jamming is. And that's what Monterey was.``



To: JakeStraw who wrote (25716)3/27/2001 11:47:39 PM
From: SIer formerly known as Joe B.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 49844
 
Letter to Dead Heads: March 27, 2001

During the time that GDP was a partnership, and then later when it became a
corporation, we as a group always bought and maintained the instruments used
by the band on stage and in recording. We did this purposely. Because all of
the stage instruments were bought and maintained in the same way, we thought
we had avoided any arguments over who owned what. We all owned it all. All
for one and one for all. We always knew that the whole of what we were was
greater than the sum of its parts and that our musical legacy should never be
broken apart, even after we stopped touring. This is not the position of
"just another corporation," as some have suggested. It is a fact which was at
the heart of our business from the earliest days. None of the band members,
by common agreement, can give away our instruments or any other GDP property.
No-one's passing changes this. We believe we can prove that the Irwin guitars
were bought by and belong to GDP and that they should remain in our
possession. What Jerry actually said in his will was "my Irwin guitars," and
we feel and understand that that applies only to instruments he never used
onstage and are not the celebrated guitars Doug and his attorneys are
seeking.

Doug Irwin's motives and those of his lawyers appear pretty clear. They want
the money the guitars will bring at public auction. Our months of discussions
have centered on the claim that Mr. Irwin is broke and needs the money to
attend to his personal needs. While we actually do sympathize with Mr.
Irwin's financial problems, he is sufficiently desperate to also claim that
we (and presumably everyone else in the world) has no right to publish or use
any photograph of Jerry Garcia playing any of the instruments Irwin built
unless a copyright royalty is paid to him. If this were the case,
Fruit-of-the-Loom, which made Jerry's black T-shirts, would own GDP by now.
We have also rejected that claim.

Seemingly lacking faith in their legal case, Mr. Irwin and his lawyers will
doubtless keep coming at us in the public forum, trying to pressure us into
caving in to their demands by publicly claiming a moral high ground, but it
will eventually be seen that they have a narrow field of focus: their
pockets. For example, on Thursday, March 15, we were actually sitting in a
face to face meeting with Doug Irwin and his attorney, Doug Long, which was
supposed to be a good faith negotiation when we received information that Mr.
Irwin and his lawyers had, without notice, called a press conference for that
same afternoon. Mr. Long claimed to our face to be unaware of the press
plans, which was obviously not true.

GDP has said from the beginning of our discussions with Doug and his
succession of lawyers that the guitars belong to the fans and GDP has always
intended to place them on public display as a complete group so that the fans
could enjoy them. If Irwin and his lawyers succeed, they will be sold to the
highest private bidder and will likely disappear from view forever. The
simple fact is that none of the museums to which everyone would like the
instruments to go will be willing to pay the price Mr. Irwin believes the
guitars will bring. They have quoted numbers in the millions of dollars. GDP,
along with any museum, would disappear from the bidding early on. Even if an
acceptable museum was willing to pay what Mr. Irwin demands, however, we do
not believe that we should be forced to let others decide how our legacy, of
which Jerry was obviously an integral part, be presented. Because our right
to possess the guitars is now apparently in question, we intend to
immediately arrange for their display in the best venue we can locate and
provide at least this opportunity for the guitars to be viewed pending the
outcome of the lawsuit filed by Doug Irwin.

We do not mean to dishonor either Jerry's memory or the spirit of his will.
We have attempted to resolve this dispute with financial offers to Irwin. We
do not believe, however, and will not be convinced, that Jerry meant for his
instruments to be sold at public auction to the highest bidder by Doug as the
centerpiece of a '60s memorabilia sale and that they would thereafter
disappear from the view of the fans forever. Jerry was a modest man. He never
believed the hype about himself and we think he would be wearily shaking his
head at the prospect that the guitars are potentially worth what Mr. Irwin
and his lawyers allege they are. In any event, what the guitars are "worth"
to GDP has nothing to do with money. They are a part of the Grateful Dead
legacy and GDP will never voluntarily sell them to anyone under any
circumstances at any time.

We clearly disagree with most of what Doug's lawyer has written here in the
past few days, but we will not respond issue by issue. A few of the
statements made by Doug Long, however, cannot stand unchallenged. Long says
in one of his posts that no financial offer of any kind has been made to Doug
Irwin. That isn't true and he knows it. Long also alleges that GDP has
admitted that the Wolf guitar belongs to Doug Irwin and refuses to deliver
it. That is also false. The Wolf was listed on a preliminary inventory of the
Estate in which no band member or executive of GDP was involved. Ownership of
all of the instruments remains in dispute and Long is very well aware of that.

As we know you must believe, the very idea that GDP would place the guitars
in the hands of a "stand in" Jerry Garcia and that the Dead will thus play
again is simply ludicrous. Mr. Irwin knows that and his lawyers know that. We
have told them of our long-term display plans on virtually every occasion we
have talked with them. In contrast, they have simply dressed up Mr. Irwin's
desire to sell the instruments with a story about funding a school and the "f
ear of a fake Jerry" story in the past few days for public consumption to
gain sympathy. They want you to be angry with us. They want to pressure us to
do what they think is right. As you know, we have always done what WE think
is right and we are doing so here.

Finally, there is a theme in some circles that GDP is becoming just like
other corporations and that it is now run by faceless executives who do not
understand the Grateful Dead journey. The corporation is now, and always has
been, a democracy made up exclusively of members of the band. At present, the
directors and sole owners are Bob, Phil, Billy and Mickey. No one makes
decisions for us and no one is leading us down any garden path. We respect
your right to disagree with what we think is best, but understand that the
same people who have always made the decisions still make them.

Regrettably, this matter will apparently be decided in the courts. We believe
we will prevail and we also believe that we have dealt with Doug in good
faith and that he and his lawyers have not dealt with us in the same way. No
one detests litigation more than we do. We did not start this. But we must
finish it.

(Signed)
Bobby Weir, Mickey Hart, and Bill Kreutzmann for Grateful Dead Production