SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (9831)3/27/2001 10:27:52 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
It means, Ebill, that he is only an alleged rapist- and even then only alleged by a certain political segment of the population. I wasn't in the room with him, I haven't even seen the evidence- and neither, I suspect, have you. What we have both been exposed to is a great deal of hearsay. He has a documented history of being sexually active. I know of no history of actual "abuse" that is documented in any legal way. You should be a bit more circumspect in what you say about people, Ebill. Someday you may have to answer for what you say.

In answer to your rather silly question, what I say does NOT mean he didn't rape anyone. I've no idea what he has done. You were the one rather oddly comparing Bill Clinton to Ted Bundy- which, imo, greatly minimizes the horrific nature of Bundy's crimes. I am sure the families of his victims would not think your comparison very apt. I did not find your comparison very apt. In fact, I found it rather horrible that you could link the two even in your own mind.



To: Bill who wrote (9831)3/27/2001 2:17:36 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
He's an accused rapist.

Why don't you just call him a misogynist? I think that's apt.

Karen