Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crystal ball who wrote (4480)	3/28/2001 3:20:12 PM
From: David E. Taylor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6784

CB: I think you need to cut Carl Y some slack here. First, the "two founders' of Palm left 3Com in 1998, and none of the present Palm management team (except Kessler) were even around at 3Com at that point, the management was EB and Co. at 3Com, and the present Palm management had nothing to do with Dubinsky and Hawkins leaving. We'll see in 2-3 years whether Palm or Handspring is the better managed company with better prospects. Second, we have no idea what factors prevented Palm from having the m500/505 in volume production with initial shipments already made by the time of the 3/19 announcement. Not only are these new models a fairly radical new platform that they've put together in the last year, they've also brought out two other new models and two upgraded models, as well as the OS4.0 upgrade, all the wireless initiatives, the Palm.net operation, the three acquisitions, etc. etc., in the year since the IPO. Plus they are hard at work on OS5.0, the new Strongarm hardware platform, the MOT smartphone, the VIIx replacement, the enterprise push, etc. etc. There was more than a touch of chagrin in Yankowski's voice when he said on the CC that when he came on board and Palm was spun off three months later, there was an "empty pipeline" of new products and OS upgrades. 3Com was essentially sitting on the Palm V saying "aren't we smart asses?", without any forward planning for new products in a market that has a product shelf life of 18 months at best. I don't believe that Carl Y. is such an idiot that he would have a delayed product launch like this if he could prevent it, since he knows it kills his Q4, normally the best of the year for Palm. Expect some production management "re-alignment" to result from this screw up. And as for the forward guidance - now what would you have them say? Bruner said that on the current production schedule, Q4 will be back end loaded, because they can only count on the "initial stocking shipment" of the m500/505 for Q4. TG is probably right that the drop off in Vx orders occurred right after the 3/19 formal announcement, as retailers and distributors figured they'd clean out Vx inventory over the next month or so, and wait for the new models to come in. Should Palm management have seen this coming? None of we smart people here did, neither did any of the smart analysts. And even if Palm did, should they have kept quiet about the launch, squashed the rumors, and put off the announcement until late April/early May or later when the units will be ready to ship in volume? IMO, Q4 would still have been a problem, and the only thing that could have avoided this would have been having the units already shipped and ready for launch on 3/19 with the announcement, something that apparently just wasn't doable. So they've said all they can say right now about the Q4 guidance, and if they'd painted a rosier picture, it would have been based on hope and not the facts in front of them. So yes, we have a product launch screw up and a short term problem, and yes, management has to take the responsibility for that, whatever the cause. But with the water under the bridge already, I think we should give them this next Q to see how the actual launch goes before we start yelling for the guillotine. JMO, and I'm as pissed as anyone else here. David T.