Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (9963)	3/28/2001 1:51:25 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 82486

It is a bit much, I admit.....

To: average joe who wrote (9963)	3/28/2001 3:40:45 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

<<<Anyone that disagrees with E is a fat fundamentalist bible thumping with heavy jowls hullabalazoo... If you won't the conformity police will be tattled to. >>> Again you are lying. You insinuate that I have called people, or anyone, fat. Fat bible-thumpers, in fact. With "heavy jowls." That wouldn't be very nice of me, would it? Anyone reading that would surely think I was mean, insulting an adversary's physical appearance! So, liar, show where I associated anyone's beliefs with overweight, called Christians "bible-thumpers," or ridiculed anyone's "heavy jowls." The word "hullabalazoo" I've never heard before. You make this lying insinuation yet again: <<the conformity police will be tattled to.>> Again, I inform you: I have never asked that anyone be suspended. I have never reported anyone to Big Daddy-- with the exception of the person who threatened me, and I asked that that person NOT be suspended -- so the insinuation that I am a tattler is not only a lie, it is an ironic lie, because you have admitted being a tattler. You crybaby liar. Let's spell it out: I don't tattle. You do.