SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Golden Bear who wrote (52333)3/28/2001 7:00:20 PM
From: Bipin Prasad  Respond to of 53903
 
Most guys over here are either heatless-ruthless shorts or shark pooot holders. Nobody could squash Bug for yrs. Been there done that kind guys. So don't worry about these guy's feelings. No matter what, they will give you big teddy bear hugs.

later,

InSook Prasad



To: Golden Bear who wrote (52333)3/28/2001 7:03:46 PM
From: Paul Kern  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Assuming that MU goes from earning $2.53 a share to earning nothing or losing a few cents a share, $30 isn't out of the question. Of course, it might take a forensic accountant to work out the actual number but I'm sure that the institutions, who hold most of the shares, have a few on staff.

Paul



To: Golden Bear who wrote (52333)3/28/2001 8:21:53 PM
From: IceShark  Respond to of 53903
 
Sure, If Axa decides to quit buying. As I have noted before in split adjusted numbers MU traded as high as 48 on 8.50 earnings projections for the next year. Of course that was back in saner days. I'd like to know what these new guys are thinking.



To: Golden Bear who wrote (52333)3/29/2001 11:15:06 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
>>Nothing against anyone here, but could MU break below 30?<<

does mu have to break $30 in order to get to $3 - fair value? ;-)