SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack T. Pearson who wrote (73471)3/28/2001 7:10:35 PM
From: iod_sherwood  Respond to of 99985
 
agree... I think CSCO might even ponder a reverse split later in the year when it's trading in the 9-13 ranges... As will possibly several other tech companies...

I'm not that big a fan of JDSU... the other two are ok... Might be a good place for some alternative energy bubbling later this year... investment bankers would probably love to do a few big secondaries for ACPW... CPST maybe... u know... continue the scam elsewhere ;-)



To: Jack T. Pearson who wrote (73471)3/28/2001 7:53:55 PM
From: Doug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
J.T.P: You should also compute both PSR and PCF for both time periods to establish valuation at times like this.



To: Jack T. Pearson who wrote (73471)3/28/2001 9:04:02 PM
From: brunn  Respond to of 99985
 
SCMR's P/E is 28 based on earnings projections for the current fiscal year (7/01) if you subtract their billion dollars in cash from share price. They have $3.57 in cash per share. Subtract 3.57 from 10 and divide by 23 cents and you get P/E of 28. Market is obviously questioning the validity of their earnings projections but Sycamore may become a world class company some day and getting it at a little over book value may seem like a steal someday.

Last November, I noticed the correction in many small cap equipment stocks met resistance at book value--assuming that the book value had inherent value (e.g. cash). Brooks Automation was an example. I used it as a gauge for a bottom for the overall sector--the AMAT's and NVLS's never coming close to book value but bottomed when MTSN and BRKS approached book value. I guess the problem with buying high tech at book value is the possibility of losses/charges eating up that value.