Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (9993)	3/29/2001 12:02:11 AM
From: average joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

RU486 is a dangerous drug that has many serious side effects. I hope you don't advocate the use of this as a birth control.

To: E who wrote (9993)	3/29/2001 2:27:37 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

What this thread needs is a good grub.

To: E who wrote (9993)	3/29/2001 11:00:51 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I have not given enough thought to precise penalties. My inclination is, in fact, not to penalize the woman seeking the abortion in the first trimester, but rather the provider, although I cannot easily see an alternative to a fine for contriving the purchase and use of RU 486. Nevertheless, I have not given much thought to the precise schedule of penalties, or what might constitute mitigating or aggravating circumstances. Now that you have raised the question, I am sure it will work in my mind somewhat. If I have more to say later, I will let you know.......