SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (131153)3/29/2001 2:09:52 AM
From: Dana Adams  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I have been following your skirmish with Amy and would have to agree with you. She misunderstood your post, and lashed out. Women are certainly emotionally driven.

<Currently, our society's women, in general, lack power, with very disturbing statistics like> I am surprised no one followed up on this softball. Women lack power because they are unable to take it. Real power is not something that is given. It surely is taken!

Let the games begin. The race to 20 and below is on!!

Respectfully,

Dana Adams



To: Thomas M. who wrote (131153)3/29/2001 2:10:57 AM
From: Amy J  Respond to of 186894
 
OT OT RE: "Why don't you address my post"

I think others addressed your points adequately, quite some time ago.

RE: INTC's previous over-valuation

I agree with you on this point. I believe contributions on this would be of value to the Thread, sans rudeness.

Amy J



To: Thomas M. who wrote (131153)3/29/2001 2:18:42 AM
From: Dan3  Respond to of 186894
 
Splat!

Consider yourself hit with a tomato.

Now go away.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (131153)3/29/2001 7:42:57 AM
From: GVTucker  Respond to of 186894
 
Thomas, RE: Many a soul has ventured in here politely, casting aspersions on Intel's valuation and market position, only to be pelted with tomatoes.

I've ventured on many a thread and cast aspersions on the valuation of various stocks. This thread is the only one where even a semblance of unemotional debate is possible. It's the primary reason I hang around.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (131153)3/29/2001 10:56:25 AM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tommy - Re:"Why don't you address my post, and the facts and opinions therein, rather than tossing insults (that I am biased and rude) and running."

You want someone to address the content of your post?

You are a f*cking bigot. That is all the comment that your post deserves.