To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (73539 ) 3/29/2001 9:26:27 AM From: Benkea Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985 You do know that underwriting capacity DOES NOT deduct for cap-gains, right? So, BRK is able to right insurance against IRS' MONEY! Not only that, he gets to collect 10% dividends in the interim. Not only that, BRK only pays 14% tax rate on dividends! Not only that, deduct the $4 bil + in cap-gains due on sale, and what's he going to do with the remaining $8 bil ish? He's already sitting on $30 bil in bonds - bought back when they were unfashionable in 98 and 99 (which have BLOWN away the "SPX"). So he should sell, pay taxes, and collect 5% (which BRK does not get at the tax advataged 14% tax rate!)? FWIW, KO is now less than 10% of assets! I suppose you're of the school that this is a closed end mutual fund, right? The "fund" is now up to over 110k employees! "My point is that even if he is a good investor he is very far from the claim he is trying to label himself. fact is the SPX returned same over the last 5 years so were is the investment genius he likes to attribute to himself??" Yep, book value at BRK has only compounded by around 23% (the same amount it has for DECADES) during that period. Incidentally, BRK shareholders don't give a schit about anything but book value compound rate. "His statement that AG has the right monetary policy only indicates how clueless he is. (I posted my opinion on the FED on SI ...... the FED erred since summer 1998 ........... all the way.) IMHO Muppett is just an arrogant ego centric midwestern guy that's all." It always makes me chuckle when a little guy questions the financial acumen of the #2 guy on Forbes 400. If it makes you feel more successful than Buffett and Greenspan to opin, by all means continue. 2001 and 2002 will be break out years for BRK where you'll see EPS (the number the sheep look at) absolutely SOAR YOY.